In 2006, a painting that looks like chaos sold for $140 million, making it the most expensive artwork ever sold at that time. No brushes, no easel, just paint dripped, poured, and flung onto a canvas lying on the floor. I’m Oleg G. from Art Explained Simply & Quickly, and today we’re diving into Jackson Pollock‘s revolutionary ‘No. 5, 1948‘ – a work that proved abstract art could capture the raw energy of human consciousness itself, while fundamentally changing what painting could be.
To most people, this looks like an accident. Layers of yellow, white, brown, and black paint create a web of lines so complex your eye can’t follow any single strand. But what Pollock achieved here wasn’t random – it was a breakthrough in accessing the unconscious mind through physical action, creating what critics called ‘action painting’ that would influence art for generations.
Before we dive deeper into No. 5, let me remind you of the tools we discussed in our recent video on reading abstract art. Remember the movement method – how would your body respond to this painting? The energy method – what kind of energy does this convey? These approaches are perfect for understanding Pollock, whose work operates primarily through rhythm, energy, and physical gesture rather than recognizable imagery.
Let’s start with the revolutionary technique that created this masterpiece. Pollock abandoned traditional painting methods entirely. No easel, no brushes – instead, he laid his canvas on the floor of his Long Island studio and walked around it, dripping and pouring paint directly from cans and sticks. This wasn’t just a new technique; it was a new relationship between artist and artwork.
Watch how he moved – there are films of Pollock painting that show him in an almost dance-like state, his entire body involved in the creative process. He’s not just making marks; he’s choreographing energy. Every gesture leaves a trace, creating a direct record of his movement, his rhythm, his physical presence. The painting becomes a performance frozen in time.
No. 5, 1948 measures 8 by 4 feet – large enough that Pollock had to move his entire body to reach all areas. This scale isn’t accidental. The size forces the artist into physical engagement and creates an enveloping experience for viewers. Standing before it, you don’t just look at the painting – you’re surrounded by its energy.
The layering is crucial to understanding this work. Pollock built up No. 5 through multiple sessions, each layer of dripped paint creating new relationships with what came before. Look closely and you can sense depth – some lines appear to be on top, others seem to recede into the background. This creates a space that’s neither flat nor traditionally three-dimensional, but something entirely new.
The colors aren’t random either. Yellow dominates, creating warmth and energy. White lines dance across the surface, adding light and movement. Brown and black provide weight and grounding. These color relationships work on you psychologically – remember from our abstract art video how colors interact to create emotional responses. Here, the combination suggests autumn landscapes, but also pure energy and light.
But what was Pollock actually trying to express? This gets to the heart of abstract expressionism – the movement that dominated American art in the 1940s and 50s. These artists weren’t trying to paint things; they were trying to paint feelings, unconscious thoughts, the very process of creating. Pollock called it ‘painting from the unconscious.’
Pollock was heavily influenced by Jungian psychology, particularly the idea of the collective unconscious – shared psychological patterns that exist across all human experience. His drip paintings were attempts to access these deeper layers of consciousness, bypassing rational thought to reach something more primal and universal.
The technique itself supported this goal. Traditional painting requires conscious decision-making – where to place each brushstroke, how to mix colors, how to compose the image. Pollock’s method minimized conscious control. Once the paint left his hand, gravity and physics determined where it landed. He could influence but not completely control the result.
This surrender of control was revolutionary. For centuries, artistic skill meant mastery over materials. Pollock proved that surrendering control could be equally powerful, allowing unconscious forces to emerge through the creative process. The painting becomes a collaboration between intention and accident, consciousness and chance.
Let’s compare No. 5 to some of Pollock’s other major works to understand his range. ‘Lavender Mist’ from 1950 uses softer colors and creates a more meditative feeling – if No. 5 is energetic jazz, Lavender Mist is contemplative classical music.
‘Blue Poles’ from 1952 introduces vertical elements that create structure within the chaotic drips, showing how Pollock could control his technique when he wanted focal points.
‘Autumn Rhythm’ from 1950 demonstrates how Pollock could evoke natural phenomena without depicting them directly. The rhythmic drips suggest wind through trees, falling leaves, seasonal change – all through pure abstraction. These paintings prove that non-representational art can be deeply connected to natural experience.
The physical process of creating these works was exhausting and almost spiritual for Pollock. He described being ‘in’ the painting, becoming part of the creative process rather than standing outside it as observer and controller. This total immersion is visible in the final work – you can sense the artist’s complete involvement in every line.
Critics initially dismissed these works as mindless decoration or even fraud. How could random drips be considered serious art? But deeper analysis revealed incredible sophistication. The compositions, while appearing chaotic, actually achieve remarkable balance. The distribution of visual weight, the rhythm of lines, the color relationships – all work together to create coherent artistic statements.
The influence of No. 5 and Pollock’s other drip paintings was immediate and lasting. They proved that American art could be truly revolutionary, not just derivative of European traditions. They inspired generations of artists to explore process, chance, and physical engagement with materials. They helped establish New York as the center of the international art world.
But what does No. 5 actually mean? This is where our abstract art viewing methods become essential. Using the weather method, this might be a summer thunderstorm – intense, energetic, overwhelming but ultimately cleansing. Using the music method, it could be bebop jazz – complex, improvisational, requiring your full attention to appreciate its intricate rhythms.
The title itself – ‘No. 5, 1948’ – was deliberately neutral. Pollock wanted viewers to approach the work without preconceptions, to experience it directly rather than through literary or symbolic associations. This numbering system emphasized that these were pure paintings, not illustrations of external subjects.
The record price paid for this work in 2006 reflected recognition of its historical importance. No. 5 represents a pivotal moment when American art achieved true independence from European influence and when painting expanded to include new forms of expression previously considered impossible.
Standing before this work – or even viewing high-quality reproductions – you can feel the energy Pollock channeled into it. The painting vibrates with movement and life. It’s like looking at a visual recording of pure creative energy, a direct transmission from the artist’s unconscious mind to yours.
Contemporary artists continue to wrestle with Pollock’s legacy. Some explore similar process-based approaches, others react against his influence, but few can ignore the questions he raised about control, intention, and the role of the unconscious in creativity.
No. 5, 1948 ultimately asks us to reconsider what art can be and do. It’s not depicting the world; it’s creating a new world of pure visual experience. It doesn’t tell stories; it embodies energy and feeling directly. It doesn’t please the eye; it challenges perception itself.
If you’re fascinated by art that pushes boundaries and redefines what’s possible, hit that subscribe button right now and join our community of art explorers. Every week on Art Explained Simply & Quickly, we examine works that changed how we understand art’s potential.
How does No. 5, 1948 make you feel? Can you sense the energy and movement Pollock poured into it? What do you think about art that values process over product? Share your responses in the comments below – your personal reaction is exactly what Pollock hoped to trigger.
If this video helped you appreciate the revolutionary nature of Pollock’s achievement, give it a thumbs up – it helps more people discover these incredible stories of artistic innovation. See you in the next exploration!
DISCLAIMER:
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.